Clinical coding workflow

Make the coding decision clear.

A workspace in development for keeping the clinical record, review questions and professional rationale connected.

Source evidenceHuman reviewVisible rationale
Product development and private evaluation

The platform

Useful structure around difficult clinical work.

Clinical coding decisions require judgment. The relevant documentation, open questions and final rationale are often separated across systems and hand-offs. ICD10Assist AI is being built to make that work easier to examine.

See the review path
01

Context, not fragments

Bring the relevant parts of the clinical record and the questions they raise into a reviewable view.

02

Rationale that stays visible

Keep the reason for a proposed coding path close to the information used to assess it.

03

Decisions that carry forward

Support clear hand-off, escalation and later review without treating a summary as the source record.

How it works

One review path, from record to decision.

Designed around professional control rather than automatic outcomes.

01

Start with the record

Bring together the documentation and context needed for an informed review.

02

Surface the question

Keep evidence, possible pathways and clarification needs visible to the reviewer.

03

Document the outcome

Record the decision and its basis so work can be checked, continued or handed over.

Clinical coding education and review setting

For connected teams

Coding, documentation and governance should not work from different versions of the story.

We are building for health information, coding, clinical documentation and governance professionals who need a shared, reviewable view of the work.

Professional control

Support the reviewer. Keep responsibility where it belongs.

ICD10Assist AI is intended to support qualified people carrying out a professional task. Product development and private evaluation are ongoing.

  • Human reviewers retain responsibility for final decisions.
  • Source material and reasoning remain connected for review.
  • We publish performance and compliance claims only when evidence supports them.

Early conversations

Building for the work that happens between the record and the final code.

If you work in clinical coding, documentation, health information or governance, we would like to understand the problems that make sound review harder than it should be.

Contact ICD10Assist AI